NUDG-ED: A randomised trial using behavioural nudges to reduce low-value care in Emergency Department clinical practice (#37)
Gemma Altinger
1
,
Sweekriti Sharma
1
,
Louise Cullen
,
Kirsten McCaffery
2
,
Jeffrey A Linder
3
,
Rachelle Buchbinder
4
,
Ian Harris
1
5
,
Enrico Coiera
6
,
Qiang Li
7
8
,
Kirsten Howard
9
,
Andrew Coggins
10
,
Paul Middleton
10
11
,
Naren Gunja
12
,
Trevor Chan
13
,
Ian Ferguson
14
,
Chris G Maher
1
,
Adrian C Traeger
1
,
Karen Tambree
15
- Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, Sydney Local Health District and The University of Sydney, Sydney
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne
- Whitlam Orthopaedic Research Centre, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Sydney
- Centre for Health Informatics, Macquarie University, Sydney
- The George Institute for Global Health, UNSW , Sydney
- The George Institute for Global Health, UNSW , Sydney
- Menzies Centre for Health Policy and Economics, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney
- Discipline of Emergency Medicine, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney
- South Western Emergency Research Institute, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology, Western Sydney Health, Sydney
- Emergency Care Institute, The Agency for Clinical Innovation, St Leonards, Sydney
- Emergency Department, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool
- NUDG-ED Consumer Advisor, Sydney
BACKGROUND:
- In busy Australian emergency departments (ED), 75% of patients presenting with low back pain without red flags will receive unnecessary imaging, opioids, or both.
- Neither is recommended as they offer little benefit and have short- and long-term harms and are considered low-value in this context.
- This is the first study to test if visual and social cues (nudges) reduce imaging and opioid prescribing for uncomplicated low back pain in ED.
METHODS:
- Design: A 2x2 factorial, open label, before-after, cluster randomised controlled trial design measuring the effectiveness of nudges in reducing low-value care.
- Participants: ED clinicians who manage back pain, and approx. 2416 patients 18 years or over presenting to ED with uncomplicated back pain will be recruited from 8 hospitals across 3 Sydney local health districts.
- Interventions: Hospitals will be randomised into 1 of 4 groups:
- Clinician nudges in the electronic medical record
- Patient nudges in the ED waiting room
- Both nudges combined
- No intervention
- There will be a 3-month before period, followed by a 6-month intervention period.
- Outcomes: The primary outcome will be the proportion of low back pain encounters where a person received low-value imaging tests in ED or an opioid prescription at discharge, assessed by chart review.
- Secondary outcomes include clinician knowledge; patient reported outcomes; and cost-effectiveness of the intervention.
RESULTS:
- The trial will commence in early 2024. We will discuss the complexity of designing a trial of behavioural interventions to reduce low-value care.
CONCLUSION:
- This study will be the first to test the impact of clinician and patient nudges on reducing low-value care. NUDG-ED has the potential to improve health outcomes for patients presenting to the ED with low back pain, reducing overdiagnosis, overtreatment and improving the stewardship of health resources.